The worst thing about this system is that those who have it believe that they have solv the problem, but that is not true… As I said: death to site maps. Never relate them to sitemaps.xml. The latter are a great tool for doing SEO, while outdat site maps are just a vestige of the dark past of SEO.
We can send the sitemap to
Google in several ways, not just through Google Search Console.
This is one of the basic but vital points for Google to read our sitemap. The sitemap is not like the robots file that is always stor in the same URL, but we can practically give it any name. So we have to tell Google (or Bing) where to search.
This is done through Google
Search Console, where we will find a section call sitemap where we can indicate this URL. We misname this action “uploading the sitemap”. You don’t upload cash app database anything, but this name has been retain.
We will see later that this is the best
Possible way, as it gives us certain statistics about errors and their reading, but it is not the only one, in fact we can use two more ways to indicate these files to Google.
By indicating it in the robots.txt:
This is one of the recommend ways and can be a great advantage when we do generic implementations on many sites at the same the protocol is very simple time, or for whatever reason, we cannot access the Google Search Console for each domain separately. It can also be a good option for smaller search engines. For example, if we are going to work mainly on Google but we want Bing to read our sitemaps (even if we are not going to work on them in Bing) we can add it to Robots.txt and also register them in Google Search Console.
It’s as simple as declaring all the sitemap files you want yeezys shoes with the “siteamap:” declaration at the beginning of the line.